Resolutioner Radikale Venstre11/23/2023 ![]() Thorning can hope that, in her first period as prime minister, she will be surrounded by so much positive media interest that the Danes will look more kindly towards her than today and have more confidence in her skills. It will likely quickly be apparent that it is harder to keep power than it is to win it. So it will be a triumph for her fellow party members to see their leader become prime minister - and their enthusiasm will be reinforced by the fact that she will be able to write Danish history as the nation's first woman head of government. It goes without saying that Thorning will be celebrated as a heroine by her supporters on election night if the Social Democrats succeed in capturing the Prime Minister's office.įor ten long years the party has been kept out of the corridors of power and been relegated to the opposition benches. If Helle Thorning-Schmidt becomes head of government on Thursday evening - after she has been in the lead for a long time in the opinion polls - a new and different era will begin. It was supported by the Danish People's Party, which has acted as the government's loyal support party and been rewarded by being invited right into the powerhouse by Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Hence, the article concludes, the introduction of MMR in Denmark was delayed due to political and financial circumstances in the 1970’s and 1980’s, and the eventual introduction was due to four circumstances: 1) a change in the health authority perceptions of the diseases 2) public health and prevention became a political priority as a result of the tight state budgets 3) pressure from WHO, and 4) pressure from the public, the counties and the Parliamentary opposition.In this decade, a Liberal/Conservative government, led first by Anders Fogh Rasmussen and later by Lars Løkke Rasmussen, has been in power. This, in combination with pressure from parents and the media, forced the government to introduce MMR. Shortly thereafter, the Danish Social Liberal Party (Radikale Venstre) proposed a parliamentary resolution in favour of the introduction of MMR. County-level officials had been convinced by the cost-benefit analysis, so in late 1985, the Association of County Councils initiated a MMR program. In the end, other actors played a decisive role. While the ministry deployed different strategies, among others a cost-benefit-analysis, it failed to convince the government as a whole. The Ministry for the Interior welcomed the recommendation, but the tight budgets and the Conservative-led government made it difficult to find money for the new vaccines. ![]() In 1983, the National Board of Health issued a recommendation for an MMR vaccination program aimed at children ages 15 months and 12 years. Once urgency was established, medical data was presented to demonstrate the value of providing all three vaccines in a single inoculation ![]() Thus, the first step in the political process was the reframing of all three diseases as serious health threats, a task made easier by pressure placed by the World Health Organization on Denmark to contribute to its global campaign against measles. By contrast, the Danish health authorities considered measles and mumps trivial childhood diseases, and congenital rubella syndrome was solved by offering abortions to pregnant women who were infected. Using the multiple streams framework developed by John Kingdon, this article traces how MMR was placed on the political agenda and eventually introduced on a national scale.ĭuring the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, most Western countries had introduced vaccines against one or more of the diseases. ![]() In 1987, after a multi-year policymaking process, Denmark introduced the combined measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine into the childhood vaccination program. The introduction of MMR vaccinations in Denmark 1983-1987 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |